I don't think that has as much to do with society as it does with technology...

Your opinion is that the problem with society isn't societies problem... but that goes against the question unless you mean to say that the only problems in society are not societal problems at all... they are just issues concerning human nature.

An interesting question, if these 'issues concerning human nature' are really human nature, why do we have a problem with them? We choose what is virtuous or not, why is something that comes natural to us so unwholesome? Take for instance, selfishness. If selfishness comes naturally to us, why do we see it as something that is not virtuous?

I did sort of say "find the root of the problems ... proposes solutions."

Overpopulation is a problem of what society? There are fully developed counties in Europe that are seeing a negative population growth.

Inflation is a societal problem, or an economic problem?

Corruption, Racism, Sexism, Ageism, and Environmentalism, ok. Why do you think these are problems?

"Society can never achieve greatness as long as someone can succeed on another person's failure."

Who here is succeeding and who is failing? I'm not quite sure what you mean here. I get your point though, about the economy that is supposedly based on greed, but can you explain this a little better? Use examples maybe...

Why is it most scholars find postmodern society to be a "degenerate social phase" if everything is so much better today? Can you point out a few ways in which our society is better than past societies?

Too much is when it gets in the way of being productive.

An hour of television is too much.

It's not proper communication if there isn't an exchange of information. The television just talks at you and you listen.

People could be studying more effectively via a computer.

People can learn via television, but they can also learn by drawing pictures in sand.

Most likely not. Paper news maybe but not television news.

Stress is caused by people having shit to do, but their favorite shows are always on, so they'll never actually do what they need to do... that must be stressful. I think maybe, you think that if people didn't have televisions they would shoot other people, but that's because you have watched too much television in your life...

If you play chess you know that your duty is to capture the king or eliminate all other pieces without threatening your own pieces... You have to be at least five steps ahead of your opponent, which is a gamble at first, and highly tactical later when there are less variables.

The same is true in first-person shooters. If you're a good player, you are always predicting your opponents moves. When you play tactical game types like capture the flag or control point, it gets even more tactical. You have an entire team to manage, you have to predict spawn times, spawn locations, your enemy's goals, advantages in terrain, what load-outs your team is using, and what your team is using... RTS's are even more difficult when you get into it.

"A human is not capable of causing enough mayhem and pain in their one short lifetime to merit an eternity of this kind of hell."

How do you know that standing up to a God doesn't merit eternal suffering? Remember, assuming there is a God that created absolutely everything in existence (maybe even God itself facepalm), you cannot judge the righteousness or virtue of it's actions. God defines what is right and wrong, after all. You don't know that suffering for eternity would be infinitely better than other things that God could put you through...

Wow, it's been a while. You said this 589 days ago! I guess I didn't get your response until now. :|

Your term "fitness" is too general as well. Fit for what?